Twelve little girls in two straight lines got the flu! |
I
was at a performance of Madeleine’s Christmas at a local theater the other day,
my two children in tow. Madeleine’s Christmas is a charming book in the
Madeleine series by Ludwig Bemelmans, written in 1956. But as I watched the storyline unfold
on stage, I found myself thinking like the MWV that I am,
worrying about the eleven little girls suffering from influenza in an age when
there was little to help them, besides the warm soup Madeleine (the only one
unaffected) was able to serve them. I think my MWV radar was unusually
sensitive that day, too, because my sixty-six-year-old father, who had received
the flu vaccine this year, had just finished a bad bout with this year’s flu,
and my children and I were struggling to kick a variety of different
viruses as well.
Luckily,
the eleven little girls—and Miss Clavel—all recovered in time to take a magic
carpet ride around Paris, but the show did get me to thinking about how unusual
this year’s flu season has been and why it’s so important that we see
widespread vaccination, so that vulnerable people who might be more suspectible
to the flu, even if they’ve been vaccinated (like my father), are better
protected.
So
I asked the folks at the CDC some of the questions that might be on your mind this
flu season. The information below comes directly from CDC press releases, the CDC website, and communication with CDC representatives.
Why
does the 2012-2013 flu season seem to be worse than previous flu seasons?
Flu
seasons are unpredictable. The severity of influenza seasons can differ
substantially from year to year. Over a period of 30 years, between 1976 and
2006, estimates of yearly flu-associated deaths in the United States range from
a low of about 3,000 to a high of about 49,000 people during the most severe
season. Each year in the United States on average more than 200,000 people may
be hospitalized during a flu season. The 2009 H1N1 pandemic is an example of
how unpredictable the flu can be. Click here for more information about the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.
The
2011-2012 season began late and was relatively mild compared with previous
seasons (see “2011-2012 Flu Season Draws to a Close” for
more information). Most of the viruses characterized so far this season have been H3N2 viruses; which are typically associated with more severe seasons.
Did
the 2012-2013 flu season start “early”?
Significant increases in flu activity in the United States have occurred in the last two weeks (editor’s
note: refers to late November, early December), indicating that an early flu
season is upon us. Influenza-like-illness (ILI) activity levels in parts of the
country are already higher than all of last season. 5 states are already
reporting the highest level of activity possible. Click here for information from the CDC that discusses flu activity thus far.
How
effective is the flu vaccine?
The
composition of the flu vaccine is reviewed each year. If needed, the vaccine is
updated to protect against the three flu viruses that research indicates will
be the most common during the upcoming season. New vaccine is manufactured
every season. The 2012-2013 flu vaccine will protect against an influenza A
(H1N1) virus, an influenza A (H3N2) virus and an influenza B virus.
Two
factors play an important role in determining the likelihood that influenza
vaccine will protect a person from influenza illness: 1) characteristics of the
person being vaccinated (such as their age and health), and 2) the similarity
or "match" between the influenza viruses in the vaccine and those
spreading in the community.
In
general, the flu vaccine works best among young healthy adults and older
children. Lesser effects of flu vaccine are often found in studies of young
children (e.g., those younger than 2 years of age) and older adults. Older people, who may
have weaker immune systems, often have a lower protective immune response after
influenza vaccination compared to younger, healthier persons. This can result
in lower levels of vaccine effectiveness in these people. (This might explain
why my father, who got the vaccine, still got the flu).
The good news is that most of the viruses characterized at CDC so
far this season are well-matched to the vaccine viruses.
I
want to make one note about the basic science of flu vaccines. Every once in a
while, you might find an anti-vaccine website, like NaturalNews, make a comment
about the flu vaccine. Last year, it was a story on its site that said that the
reason a new flu vaccine had to be created every year is because the scientists
“couldn’t get it right.” Most of you probably see scientific illiteracy in this
statement, but in case it’s not clear, the flu virus changes each year, unlike most other
vaccine-preventable diseases, and therefore a vaccine must “match” the
predicted influenza viruses likely to spread in the community during the
upcoming flu season in order to be effective.
You
might also hear some people—even people in the world of public health—denigrating
the current flu vaccines as ineffective. This shouldn’t be interpreted as a
call to forgo the vaccine. Most of the time, when public health authorities, or
leaders in the world of epidemiology, such as Michael Osterholm of the
University of Minnesota, criticize the flu vaccine, they are advocating for a universal flu vaccine, or at least a better seasonal flu vaccine, both of which scientists are working on.
I will take 60%
protection over nothing any day, having lived through flu myself in years
previous. And, without question, I would offer my children that same
protection. I’m pretty sure that if that rug merchant in Madeleine’s Christmas
had been peddling flu vaccines instead of magic carpets, the twelve little
girls in two straight lines would have had a healthier Christmas, too.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.